- PLoS That. 2022; 17(6): e0270103. »
- Choice Letter 0
2022; 17 (6) : e0270103. Typed on the internet 2022 Jun 29. doi: /log.pone.0270103.r001 Johnson Chun-Play Cheung, Section Editor Copyright © 2022 Johnson Chun-Play Cheung
This will be an open availability post marketed under the regards to the brand new Creative Commons Attribution Licenses, which it permits unrestricted fool around with, shipping, and you will reproduction in any typical, provided the original writer and you may provider try credited.
If you like and also make transform to the monetary revelation, please is your upgraded statement on your own cover letter
Immediately following careful consideration, we believe that it has merit however, doesn’t fully satisfy PLOS Your guide criteria whilst currently really stands. Ergo, i receive that submit a revised sorts of the latest manuscript you to definitely tackles brand new items elevated inside the remark process.
Delight submit the changed manuscript by the . For a moment you desire additional time than it accomplish the updates, delight reply to so it content otherwise contact the fresh new record place of work in the Before you go add the posting, log in to and select the newest ‘Submissions Looking for Revision’ folder so you’re able to to find your own manuscript document.
A great rebuttal letter that responds every single point increased of the academic editor and you will reviewer(s). You should publish it letter while the an alternate document branded ‘Response to help you Reviewers’.
Reasonable-right up duplicate of the manuscript that highlights change built to the new original variation. You ought to publish which because a different file branded ‘Revised Manuscript which have Song Changes’.
An unmarked style of your own revised paper in the place of tracked change. You really need to publish this because the an alternative file branded ‘Manuscript’.
In the event the relevant, we recommend that you put the lab standards into enhance this new reproducibility of the performance. assigns their process its very own identifier (DOI) therefore it shall be cited by themselves subsequently. To own guidelines come across: At exactly the same time, PLOS One offers a selection for publishing peer-examined Laboratory Process articles, and that explain protocols managed into . Find out more information regarding revealing standards during the
step one. Please ensure that your manuscript fits PLOS A person’s design standards, including those individuals for file naming. New PLOS One to concept templates is available from the
“It opportunity try backed by a victims out of Crime Operate (VOCA) government pass-thanks to offer awarded to function of the Colorado Governor (OOG) Child Sex Trafficking Class and you may Traffick911. The fresh new sponsor associated with the method – Traffick911 – have assisted towards the investigation structure and you can research collection package revealed in this protocol. Traffick911 directors have accepted the newest protocol discussed herein. New opinions, results, conclusions, and you can katolska singelkvinnor pointers shown in this guide are the ones of the journalist(s) and don’t necessarily mirror brand new feedback of one’s VOCA, OOG, otherwise Traffick911.
Excite county just what part the funders took in the research. Should your funders had no character, please state: “”Brand new funders didn’t come with character when you look at the research design, data collection and you will investigation, decision to share, otherwise planning of manuscript.””
Delight were so it amended Part away from Funder report in your cover letter; we’ll alter the on line distribution means for you.
3. The ethics statement should merely come in the methods section of your manuscript. When your stability declaration is written in every point in addition to the Steps, delight remove they out-of any other part.
Customer #1: That it process means a significant assessment regarding an anti-sex trafficking system, in addition to resulting analyses will likely be a significant addition towards field
p2: This new figure for 300,000 within-chance youth shall be made clear, since bounds for which childhood are considered on the line from inside the so it solution won’t be the same due to the fact men and women utilized later within the the ways to decide and this people are “on the line” and you can qualified to receive the program. The language are changed in these introductory paragraphs plus in the ways to make it obvious into the reader this difference is available.